Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner Banking Blog

Bank Bryan Cave

Beneficial Ownership

Main Content

FinCEN’s Beneficial Owner Proposal Conflicts with FCRA

On August 4, 2014, FinCEN released proposed rules that would require banks and certain other financial institutions to identify the “beneficial owners” of their business entity customers and to verify the identity of each such beneficial owner (the “Proposal”).  If the Proposal results in final rules that are substantially identical to the proposed rules, financial institutions might be unable to comply without violating the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”).

Under the Proposal, “beneficial owners” would generally include at least one manager of the entity and each individual owning 25% or more of the entity.  This could mean up to five individuals if no manager also owns 25% or more of the entity.

The Proposal would require a financial institution first to identify the customer’s beneficial owners.  This should be reasonably manageable because institutions would be able to provide a certification form to its customer and require that the customer name its beneficial owners.  Financial institution’s would not be required to take independent steps to verify the status of such persons as beneficial owners.

The potential legal conflict arises under the second prong of the Proposal, under which the financial institution would be required to verify the identity of those persons whom it has been told are the customer’s beneficial owners.  The Proposal would require a financial institution to verify the identity of each beneficial owner using risk-based procedures that are “identical to the covered financial institution’s Customer Identification Program procedures required for verifying the identity of customers that are individuals.”

Whether in a deposit or loan context, banks often will obtain a single credit report or other consumer report for the combined purposes of an initial OFAC screen, to confirm the customer’s creditworthiness, and to verify the customer’s identity under the institution’s Customer Identification Program (“CIP”).  Such reports are “consumer reports” under the FCRA and therefore subject to the FCRA’s rules, including with respect to when such reports may be obtained.

Read More

FinCEN Announces September 28 Customer Due Diligence Roundtable; Releases Prepared Remarks from July Hearing

FinCEN recently announced that it would hold the second in a series of outreach events on the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) published in March 2012 on customer due diligence (CDD) and beneficial ownership requirements for financial institutions. FinCEN is seeking further clarification on a number of issues and to engage with representatives from affected financial institutions on these issues at the roundtable discussion. 

The roundtable discussion is scheduled for September 28, 2012 at the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission offices in Chicago, Illinois. The morning session (9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Central time) is for futures commission merchants and introducing brokers; the afternoon session (1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Central time) is for all other interested financial institutions. Requests to attend the roundtable are due by September 21. 

Read More
The attorneys of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner make this site available to you only for the educational purposes of imparting general information and a general understanding of the law. This site does not offer specific legal advice. Your use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Bryan Cave LLP or any of its attorneys. Do not use this site as a substitute for specific legal advice from a licensed attorney. Much of the information on this site is based upon preliminary discussions in the absence of definitive advice or policy statements and therefore may change as soon as more definitive advice is available. Please review our full disclaimer.