BCLP Banking Blog

Main Content

Jim Wheeler Quoted on TARP Capital

Jim Wheeler Quoted on TARP Capital

October 27, 2008

Authored by: Robert Klingler

Jim Wheeler was quoted extensively in today’s Fulton Daily Report story titled, “Lawyers help banks jump through Treasury hoops.”  The full story is available online (subscription required).

After Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced more details of the plan Oct. 20, Wheeler said his bank clients were still divided about whether to take the money. “One said he was not going to go public. One said he didn’t want to, but he needs the money,” he said.

But Wheeler and other lawyers said the department appears to be retailoring the plan so that banks that don’t have preferred shares of stock can participate. If that requirement is adjusted, said Wheeler, “It opens the floodgates.”

“Going public has been the biggest sticking point so far. Now, everybody is cautiously optimistic that they won’t have to,” he added.

“The plan wasn’t designed for the community banks, but for the big nine banks,” said Wheeler, referring to gargantuan commercial banks such as Bank of America and Goldman Sachs that have already sold $125 billion in equity to the government in a separate deal.

Powell Goldstein will continue to monitor Treasury’s actions regarding TARP Capital as it relates to community banks, and will provide updates on this website.

Read More

Additional Guidance on Troubled Bank Eligibility

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair has informed the Florida Bankers Association that higher CAMELS rated banks can apply for the Treasury Capital Program, but it will subject those banks to further regulatory scrutiny.

Another regulator with a federal banking agency informed the Florida Bankers Association as follows:

CAMELS ratings are not the sole determinant and each situation will be looked at individually. Based on what we know thus far, we think many 3-rated banks will meet the standards as long as there are no mounting deficiencies that suggest future prospects are poor or that additional downgrades are likely. Further, it is possible that certain 4-rated banks will qualify, as long as conditions are stable or improving. We also think that a larger number of troubled banks might warrant TARP approval if there is an accompanying injection of private capital.

In addition to the above, banks with less than satisfactory CRA ratings are not likely to be approved. Further, banks with certain risk factors such as high concentrations of construction and development loans will be subject to closer scrutiny, although that will not necessarily disqualify them.

Although ultimate approval for troubled banks remains unlikely, it is very clear that regulators want troubled banks to present proposals for consideration under the TARP Capital plan, and that no regulator wants to be blamed for erroneously pushing a struggling bank out of the program.

Read More

FDIC Issues Interim Rule to Implement the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

The rule is immediately effective, although comments will be taken for a 15-day period.

The FDIC strongly encourages banks to remain in the program.

Opt Out Information. Any institution desiring to opt out must do so by 11:59 p.m. on November 12, 2008.  An institution may opt out of the FDIC’s guarantee of either or both the newly-issued senior unsecured debt or noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts.  The FDIC will post on its website a list of those entities that have opted out of either component, and each eligible entity must make clear to relevant parties whether it has chosen to participate in the program.

All insured depository institutions must post a prominent notice in the lobby of its main office, and each branch must clearly indicate whether the institution is participating in the transaction account guarantee program.  If it is, the notice must state that funds held in noninterest-bearing transaction accounts are insured in full by the FDIC.  If the institution uses sweep arrangements, the institution must disclose those actions to the affected customers and clearly advise them, in writing, that such actions will void the FDIC’s guarantee.  (However, note the exception below for sweeps to noninterest-bearing savings accounts.)

Newly Issued Senior Unsecured Debt Guarantee Information. Senior unsecured debt generally includes federal funds purchased, promissory notes, commercial paper, and unsubordinated unsecured notes.  Senior unsecured debt does not include, among other instruments, obligations from guarantees or other contingent liabilities, derivatives, derivative-linked products, debt paired with any other security, convertible debt, capital notes, the unsecured portion of otherwise secured debt, or negotiable certificates of deposit.

The FDIC will guarantee newly issued unsubordinated debt in a total amount up to 125 percent of the par or face value of the senior unsecured debt outstanding, excluding debt extended to affiliates, as of September 30, 2008, that was scheduled to mature before June 30, 2009.  The maximum amount guaranteed is calculated for each individual participating entity in a holding company structure and cannot be transferred between a bank and its holding company or between banks in a multi-bank holding company structure.  All entities will be required to provide the amount of outstanding senior unsecured debt as of September 30, 2008 to the FDIC via FDIConnect.

Read More

Silverton's Overview of TARP Capital

Silverton Bank has prepared an Overview of the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

Silverton Capital Corporation, the investment banking subsidiary of Silverton Bank, can provide an analysis for your institution that addresses your cost of capital and the effect that participation in the TARP Capital program would have on your earnings per share and book value per share.  For more information, contact Frank Brown at fbrown@silvertonbank.com or (770) 805-2152.

To see all Investment Banker reports on this site, please see all posts tagged Investment Banker.

Read More

Further Regulatory Focus Changes

Further Regulatory Focus Changes

October 22, 2008

Authored by: Robert Klingler

We have heard from several federal and state banking regulators that the factors that may be determinative in a bank’s application for TARP Capital are continuing to change.  We understand that federal regulators now want a “with” and “without” projection for each application, and want larger banks to indicate a willingness to buy failed and failing banks (to this end we’ve been told of large client that was given a physical list of potential banks to be bought).

One of our clients has a residual Fair Lending issue, but was told that since they have a Satisfactory CRA rating, the Fair Lending issue would not prevent the bank from receiving TARP Capital.  That client was also told that the projections should show a CRE concentration of less than 300%. Finally, the client was told to file its Application as a “Confidential Draft” to avoid public scrutiny.

Read More

FDIC Issues Guidance on TARP Capital Applications

On October 20, 2008, the FDIC published Financial Institutions Letter FIL-109-2008 that contains some useful guidance for community banks regarding the completion of TARP Capital applications.

Some of the highlights are:

  • The FDIC notes that the Treasury Department is aware of potential legal and tax obstacles for non-public, Subchapter S, or mutual corporate structure and states that it is “investigating possible alternatives.”  The FDIC provides that applicants should “describe any structural conditions that may not comply” with the announced plan.  While we hope that more details are announced for smaller reporting companies, public but non-listed companies, private companies and Subchapter S corporations, this approach allows many banks to move forward with the application process.  Please see our list of concerns and issues with the Public Term Sheet for TARP Capital.
  • While the Federal Reserve will be the primary federal regulator to consider applications for all banks with bank holding companies, holding companies should also submit the application to the appropriate federal banking regulator for their subsidiary banks.
  • Institutions with less than $1 billion in assets that serve low-to-moderate income populations and underserved communities and that have been impacted by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac stock depreciation may receive specialized consideration.  Based on this guidance, we would recommend that all institutions that were impacted by Fannie Mae or Freddic Mac stock depreciation should make special note of that in their application materials.
  • FDIC encourages all state nonmember institutions to “seriously consider” applying for TARP Capital.

An attorney in one of the OCC’s regional offices has told us that he would assume that the OCC will take a similar position to that of the FDIC.

Read More

Federal Reserve Loosens Restrictions on Private Equity

Our September 25, 2008 Client Alert analyzes the impacts of the Federal Reserve’s new policy statement easing the limitations on private equity investments in banks and bank holding companies.

Read More
The attorneys of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner make this site available to you only for the educational purposes of imparting general information and a general understanding of the law. This site does not offer specific legal advice. Your use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Bryan Cave LLP or any of its attorneys. Do not use this site as a substitute for specific legal advice from a licensed attorney. Much of the information on this site is based upon preliminary discussions in the absence of definitive advice or policy statements and therefore may change as soon as more definitive advice is available. Please review our full disclaimer.