BCLP Banking Blog

Bank Bryan Cave

Client Alerts

Main Content

Sharper Lines Mean Tighter Nets: How the FinCEN’s Latest Priorities are Another Step to Increased Enforcement

In the latest sign that the federal enforcement apparatus is slowly but surely training its sights on white-collar professionals and businesses, particularly financial services, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) published a list of priorities last week. For the last few years, prosecutors have aggressively pursued allegations of corruption and fraud – at times too aggressively, in the views of many federal judges. Executives willing to roll the dice at trials have increasingly found receptive audiences in judges who have chastised prosecutors for bringing criminal charges where the lines demarking unlawful conduct were not so clearly drawn. The publication of the FinCEN priorities is another step in drawing those lines.

Developments This Year

Earlier this year, Congress overrode then-President Trump’s veto to pass the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (“AMLA”) which included greatly increased incentives for whistleblowers to report on money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) violations, broadened BSA’s coverage to capture dealers of antiquities and cryptocurrency, and gave the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Department of Justice authority to obtain records from foreign financial institutions.

Just over a month ago, on June 3, 2021, the White House published the Memorandum on Establishing the Fight Against Corruption as a Core United States National Security Interest (the “Memorandum”). In the Memorandum, President Biden sets forth a policy of “effectively preventing and countering corruption and demonstrating the advantages of transparent and accountable governance” and commits to “lead efforts to promote good governance; bring transparency to the United States and global financial systems; prevent and combat corruption at home and abroad; and make it increasingly difficult for corrupt actors to shield their activities.” The Memorandum directs 15 federal agencies to collaborate in a 200-day “interagency review” to enhance the government’s ability to fight corruption.

FinCEN’s AML/CFT Priorities

In one tangible result of those anti-corruption efforts, FinCEN published guidance for the financial services sector just a few weeks after the release of the Memorandum, in the form of the Statement on the Issuance of the Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) National Priorities (the “Statement”) and Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism National Priorities (the “AML/CFT Priorities”). The AML/CFT Priorities are applicable to all “covered entities” – financial service providers required to maintain an anti-money laundering program under the BSA – which includes banks, money services businesses, credit card system operators, loan and finance companies, and broker-dealers.[1] While the priorities are not expected to be addressed until the effective date of regulations,[2] we expect covered entities to begin consideration of the priorities in the course of any periodic updating processes. Indeed, FinCEN recommends in their statement that covered entities begin considering how to incorporate the AML/CFT Priorities into their compliance programs.

Echoing President Biden’s earlier policy statements, the eight priorities are (1) corruption; (2) cybercrime, including relevant cybersecurity and virtual currency considerations; (3) foreign and domestic terrorist financing; (4) fraud; (5) transnational criminal organization activity; (6) drug trafficking organization activity; (7) human trafficking and human smuggling; and (8) proliferation financing.[3] A high-level summary of the AML/CFT Priorities is available here.

These updated priorities come on the heels of an already-increasing appetite for white-collar prosecution. The aggressive push from the Department of Justice can be traced back to 2015, when then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates issued the Yates Memorandum, which made “[f]ighting corporate fraud and other misconduct . . . a top priority of the Department of Justice,” especially in prosecuting individuals. A year and a half and a change in administration later, the Department of Justice’s priorities turned elsewhere — largely to combatting violent crimes — but not before a new wave of white-collar prosecutions had already begun. As the Wall Street Journal recently documented, one of these cases led a judge to vacate a conviction against a Wall Street executive, remarking that the “government completely overreached,” and that the “lines have to be very clear, because when someone crosses a line and is likely to end up in jail, you want that line to be clear.”[4]  Other judges have remarked that federal authorities have been too eager to grab cash and assets before proving any wrongdoing.[5]  

Examples of judges reaching for the extreme remedy of overriding a jury verdict are increasingly common. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this year threw out convictions of four former bank executives because the key regulation underlying their convictions was ambiguous,[6] and the Second Circuit will soon decide whether to affirm a New York federal judge’s decisions to toss guilty verdicts against hedge fund executives based on, in that judge’s view, insufficient proof of criminal intent.[7] The Wall Street Journal noted that the federal prosecutors’ normally near-perfect batting average in getting convictions has slipped to just below 80% in Wall Street cases over the past five years. That is undoubtedly because proving intent in such cases, particularly against the backdrop of murky regulations, is challenging. 

But the FinCEN priorities, along with the AMLA and the Memorandum, may indicate an intent by regulators to ratchet up the pressure. Notably, on July 6, 2021, after listing cybercrime as one of the priorities, FinCEN hired Michele Korver, a former federal prosecutor, as its first “Chief Digital Currency Advisor.”[8] Enhanced regulations yet to come will help prosecutors extract resolutions from companies and pursue individual prosecutions through trial. When those lines become more focused, verdicts are more likely to stand.

Next Steps

A robust AML/CFT program likely includes elements of the AML/CFT Priorities, but the FinCEN guidance provides helpful information that covered entities should take into consideration – and that covered entities can use to direct internal resources to specific areas of concern. The AML/CFT Priorities also highlight increased national focus on domestic terrorism and cybersecurity, the latter already front-page news from a recent spate of high-profile and critical infrastructure ransomware and hacking attacks. While compliance with the above AML/CFT Priorities is not yet required, covered institutions are encouraged to begin investigating workable solutions for implementation without overburdening compliance and regulatory teams. Starting early to update policies, procedures, and systems can minimize friction when regulations are finalized and implemented.


[1] Separate statements were published for non-bank financial institutions by FinCEN, and jointly for banks and credit unions by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. See 31 CFR Chapter X; see also summary of covered entities provided in AML/CFT Priorities, FN 6.

[2] Regulations must be promulgated within 180 days after the establishment of the priorities. 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h)(4)(D) (as amended by the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 § 6101(b)(2)(C)).

[3] Priorities.

[4] Aruna Viswanatha & Dave Michaels, Flaws Emerge in Justice Department Strategy for Prosecuting Wall Street, Wall St. J. (July 5, 2021), https://www.wsj.com/articles/flaws-emerge-in-justice-department-strategy-for-prosecuting-wall-street-11625506658.

[5] The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board, Guilty Until Proven Innocent (July 7, 2021), https://www.wsj.com/articles/guilty-until-proven-innocent-11625697428.     

[6] United States v. Harra, 985 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 2021).

[7] United States v. Mark Nordlicht, et al., No. 16 CR 640 (BMC), (Dkt. No. 799) (E.D.N.Y. 2019); Second Circuit Docket Nos. 19-3209 & 19-3207. 

Read More

Dutta: The Ninth Circuit Strikes Another Blow to FCRA Plaintiffs

On July 13, 2018, in Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 895 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2018), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment against a plaintiff that lacked Article III standing to assert a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. (“FCRA”).

The Ninth Circuit relied on Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016), and held that the plaintiff lacked standing because he “failed to establish facts showing that he suffered actual harm or material risk of harm.”

This ruling is significant in the Ninth Circuit and elsewhere because it provides construct under which defendants may successfully challenge a plaintiff’s Article III standing to assert claims under the FCRA or other federal statutes.

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner’s full client alert on the Dutta decision is available here.

Read More

Georgia Secretary of State’s Office Has An “Oops Moment” Over Personal Identifying Information

The Georgia Secretary of State posted a letter on its website on November 18, 2015 admitting that, on October 13, the office inadvertently released personal identifying information on registered voters in Georgia. While the letter does not actually spell out what information was released, a lawsuit filed in Fulton County Superior Court this week alleges that the information on the 6,184,281 Georgia voters includes:

  • voters full name
  • residential address or mailing address if that is different
  • race
  • gender
  • voter registration date
  • last date the person voted
  • their social security number
  • driver’s license number
  • date of birth.

The information had been provided on CDs to 12 groups, including political parties and journalists, in a release that normally would only include basic information, such as names, addresses, registration and the last time the person voted. Under normal circumstances, the Secretary of State makes such information available for $500 to interested individuals and entities.

The Secretary of State letter indicates that the office has retrieved all of the CDs that contained the information and has confirmed that none of the data was retained by or disseminated to any third parties. In a day and time when state and federal governments have aggressively pursued private companies for similar inadvertent disclosures, the Secretary of State may still face liability.

Read More

July 2014 Client Alerts

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in July 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

Good News for In-House Counsel:  The D.C. Circuit Court Restores Attorney-Client Privilege for Internal Investigations, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement and Government Contracts practice groups on July 2, 2014.

Federal Antitrust Laws:  A New Tool to Prohibit Pre-Petition Coordination Among Creditors?, published by the Bankruptcy, Restructuring and Creditors’ Rights group on July 14, 2014.

No More Blurred Lines?  Federal Courts Rule That Conditional Discovery Objects are No Longer Proper Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, published by the Commercial Litigation practice group on July 30, 2014.

Fraud Outweighs Fairness:  Government Contractor Cannot Recover the Value of Its Services, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations practice on July 16, 2014.

Seventh Circuit Rejects Judge Shuffling in Multidistrict Litigation Cases, published by the Securities Litigation and Enforcement group on July 3, 2014.

No False Claims Act Liability for Claiming Private Money:  Fifth Circuit Rejects Broad FCA Interpretation, published by the While Collar Defense and Investigations practice group on July 8, 2014.

SEC Brings Enforcement Action Under MCDC Initiative, published by the Broker-Dealer Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory practice on July 16, 2014.

No FCPA Liability or Penalties for Former Noble Executives:  SEC Settles FCPA Claims on Eve of Trial, published by the Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team and the White Collar Defense and Investigations practice on July 7, 2014.

The D.C. Circuit Imposes Some Due Process in the CFIUS Review Procedures But the Impact May be Limited and, in Any Case, Short-Lived, published by the National Security practice on July 18, 2014.

BNP Paribas Pleads Guilty to Criminal Charges and Collar Clearing Rights Are Suspended in the Largest U.S. Sanctions Case to Date, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team and the International Trade practice on July 2, 2014.

Failure To Appear At a Hearing — A Risky Tactic?, published by the International Arbitration Commercial Litigation practice on July 8, 2014.

Arbitration and Competition Law – New Prospects of Recovery for Victims of Antitrust Infringements, published by the Antitrust and Competition and International Arbitration groups on July 16, 2014.

Enforcement of CIS Court Judgments in England, published by the International Arbitration practice on July 4, 2014.

New UK Guidance on coping with Small Bribes and Facilitation Payments, published by the Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team on July 3, 2014.

EU & Competition Law Update – July 2014, published by the European Antitrust and Competition groups on July 7, 2014.

 EU Adds Individuals and Entities to Sanctions List and Expands Grounds for Sanctions (IRB No. 525), published by the International Trade CEE and CIS Team on July 28, 2014.

Interns Can Turn Out to Be Expensive for Companies, published by the Labor and Employment Client Service Group (Hamburg, Frankfurt) on July 21, 2014.

UK Labor and Employment Bulletin – July 2014, published by the London  Labor and Employment group on July 21, 2014.

EU Commission Proposes Radical Reform of EU Merger Regulation, published by the Antitrust and Competition practice group on July 14, 2014.

 

Read More

June 2014 Client Alerts

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in June 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

Supreme Court Holds Bare Allegation of Improper Purpose Does Not Entitle a Taxpayer to Examine IRS Officials, published by the Tax Advice and Controversy practice group on June 20, 2014.

District Judge Expands the Reach of Dodd Frank Retaliation Protections, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement, Labor and Employment, Broker-Dealer Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory practice groups on June 3, 2014.

Breaking News:  Second Circuit Reverses Rakoff Decision Rejecting SEC Settlement, Holds That Requiring Admissions was Abuse of Discretion, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement and Investment Management practice groups on June 4, 2014.

SEC Settles First Whistleblower Anti-Retaliation Case, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement and Labor and Employment practice groups on June 19, 2014.

Small Business Administration Issues Proposed Rule That Would Establish a Safe Harbor From Fraud Penalties for a Business That Acted in Good Faith in Incorrectly Representing the Firm as Being Small,  published by the Government Contracts practice group on June 26, 2014.

Ninth Circuit Issues Two Decisions Upholding Class Action Waivers in Employment Agreements, But Interplay with California Supreme Court Remains an Open Question,  published by the Labor and Employment and Commercial Litigation practice groups on June 27, 2014.

Securities Defendants Will Have New Tool To Use in Opposing Class Certification But Fraud-On-The-Market Theory Survives under Supreme Court Decision,  published by the Class and Derivative Actions and Securities Litigation and Enforcement practice groups on June 23, 2014.

California Supreme Court Affirms Use of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements, published by the Labor and Employment practice group on June 24, 2014.

Shifting Trends:  Privacy & Security Class Action Litigation, published by the Data Privacy and Security Team on June 11, 2014.

SEC to Give Credit For Self-Reporting Certain Municipal Offering Violations, published by the Broker-Dealer Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory practice on June 18, 2014.

Whither Demand Response in Wholesale Electric Power Markets?, published by the Energy and Natural Resources practice group on June 2, 2014.

FINRA Cracks Down on Use of Consolidated Reporting,  published by the Broker-Dealer Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory Practice on June 23, 2014.

Supreme Court Rejects Federal Circuit’s “Insolubly Ambiguous” Standard for Indefiniteness, published by the Intellectual Property practice group on June 3, 2014.

U.S. Supreme Court Allows Private Lanham Act Suits Against Product Labels Otherwise Compliant With Federal Law, published by the Antitrust and Competition practice, Food and Beverage Team and Intellectual Property practice on June 12, 2014.

U.S. Supreme Court Invalidates Alice Corp’s Software Patent Claims, published by the Intellectual Property practice group on June 20, 2014.

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Divided Infringement of Method Claims in Limelight v. Akamai, published by the Intellectual Property practice group on June 3, 2014.

IRS Announces Changes to Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, published by the Tax Advice and Controversy practice group on June 20, 2014.

EPA Extends Comment Period For Proposed Clean Water Act Jurisdictional Regulations, published by the Environmental practice group on June 30, 2014.

EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan Regulations:  Structure and Impacts, published by the Environmental group on June 6, 2014.

Missouri Supreme Court Holds That Statutes of Limitations Are Not Tolled by Putative Class Action Lawsuits Filed Outside of Missouri, published by the Class and Derivatives Actions practice group on June 25, 2014.

Reminder:  Increase in California Minimum Wage Effective July 1, 2014, published by the Labor and Employment practice group on June 24, 2014.

EU Proposes Greater Transparency of Beneficial Ownership,  published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations practice group and Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team on June 26, 2014.

Significant Competition/Antitrust Fines in Europe Sound the Alarm for Private Equity Over Liability for Their Portfolio Companies,  published by the Antitrust and Competition and Private Equity groups in London and Frankfurt on June 19, 2014.

Australia Imposes Targeted Ukraine-Related Sanctions on 50 Individuals and 11 Entities, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations practice group on June 19, 2014.

The French Blocking Statute:  Effective Protection Against Cross-Border Discovery?, published by the Commercial Litigation and Class and Derivative Actions practice groups on June 19, 2014.

Canada Charges 3 Foreign Nationals with Bribery of Foreign Officials, published by the Global Anti-Corruptions/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team on June 6, 2014.

EU Makes It Easier for Creditors to Recover Cross-Border Debts in the EU in Civil and Commercial Matters, but Has the UK Missed a Trick?, published by the London Commercial Litigation practice group on June 5, 2014.

EU and Competition Law Update — June 2014, published by the European Antitrust and Competition practice groups on June 9, 2014.

Thailand:  Is a Coup d’etat Force Majeure?published by the Hong Kong Commercial Litigation group on June 6, 2014.

Clarification of the Approach to Non-Arbitrable Claims — Silica Investors v Tomolugen Holdings (Singapore High Court), published by the International Arbitration practice group on June 4, 2014.

Read More

May 2014 Client Alerts

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in May 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

SEC Confirms that FINRA May Investigate Non-FINRA Companies Controlled by a FINRA Member, published by the Broker-Dealer Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory Practice on May 29, 2014.

CFTC Hopes To Attract More Whistleblowers With Issuance of First Award, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement, and Labor and Employment Investment Management practice groups on May 22, 2014.

Court Strengthens Statute of Limitations Defense Against the SEC, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement group on May 15, 2014.

Spreading the Sunshine in Private Equity:  SEC’s Observations from OCIE’s Presence Exams of Private Equity Fund Advisers, published by the Investment Management and Private Equity practice groups on May 14, 2014.

IRS Issues Guidance on Retiree Health Benefits Funded Through Captive Insurance Subsidiary, published by the Tax Advice and Controversy and Captive Insurance practice groups in May 14, 2014.

New Endangered Species Act Rules and Policy Proposedpublished by the Environmental group on May 15, 2014.

Russian Sanctions Creep (IRB No. 523), published by the International Trade CEE and CIS Team on May 13, 2014.

EU Expands Basis for Ukraine-related Sanctions Targets (IRB No. 523), published by the International Trade CEE and CIS Team on May 13, 2014.

At Last:  DoD Codifies Procedures for Addressing Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence (“FOCI”) Concerns, published by the National Security practice on May 6, 2014.

International Centre for Dispute Resolution (“ICDR”) Draft Procedures and Rules, published by the International Arbitration practice on May 8, 2014.

EU to Make It Easier to Confiscate Proceeds of Crime, published by the Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team on May 20, 2014.

Who is a Foreign Official Under the FCPA?  U.S. Appeals court Affirms Government’s Broad Reading of Instrumentality, published by the Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team on May 19, 2014.

Imminent Consumer Contracts Regulations Affecting Hotel Operators and Travel Agencies — Summary of Key Changes, published by the London Technology, Entrepreneurial and Commercial Practice and Retail Team on May 23, 2014.

Bankers Beware:  Global Financial Institutions and Regulated Firms Remain in the UK’s Firing Line, published by the Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team on May 19, 2014.

Hedging the Hedge — Are Hedging Losses Recoverable in Commodities Contracts, published by the Singapore Energy and Natural Resources group on May 14, 2014.

Labor and Employment Bulletin – May 2014, published by the London Labor and Employment practice on May 12, 2014.

EU & Competition Law Update – May 2014, published by the European Antitrust and Competition practice group on May 9, 2014.

Read More

April 2014 Client Alerts

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in April 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

 U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Standing to Sue Under Federal False Advertising Statute And Rejects Test Used by Several Circuits to Prohibit Suits Brought By Non-Competitor Businessespublished by the Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property and Trademarks practice groups on April 1, 2014.

The Australian Privacy Principles:  They don’t apply to me, do they?, published by the Data Privacy and Security team, April 1, 2014.

SEC Convenes Cybersecurity Roundtable:  Highlights Importance of Cybersecurity for Public Companies and Financial Market Participants, published by the Corporate Finance and Securities practice group and Data Privacy and Security Team, April 4, 2014.

Now It Gets Personal:  Department of Justice Obtains its First Ever Extradition on Antitrust Charges, published by the Antitrust and Competition White Collar Defense and Investigations practice on April 8, 2014.

SEC Touts Monetary Benefits of Whistleblowing, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement and Labor and Employment practice groups, April 10, 2014. 

Paving The Way for Increased Data Litigation, Court Refuses to Dismiss FTC’s Use of Deception or Unfairness Authority in Data Breach Cases, published by the Data Privacy and Security Team, April 11, 2014.

$5.15B Cleanup:  Anadarko Environmental Settlement Reveals New Government Tactics, published by the White collar Defense and Investigations and Environmental practice groups, April 11, 2014.

Court of Appeals Issues Opinion in Conflict Minerals Case:  Portion of Rule Violates First Amendment, published by the Corporate Finance and Securities practice group, April 14, 2014.

SEC Staff Responds to Court of Appeals Opinion in Conflict Minerals Case:  Game On, published by the Corporate Finance and Securities group, April 30, 2014.

Will This Be Enough?  Competitors Sharing Cyber Threat Information Will Not Result in Federal Antitrust Prosecutions — Sometimes, published by the National Security, Antitrust and Competition practice groups and the Data Privacy and Security Team

We Know Who You Are:  Companies’ Ability To Deal Confidentially With The CPSC is Further Eroded, published by the Consumer Protection and Data Privacy groups, April 18, 2014.

OCIE Issues Risk Alert Regarding Cybersecurity Preparednesspublished by the Broker-Dealer, Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory,  and Investment Management groups, April 21, 2014.

Missouri Supreme Court Deals With Trade Secret Issues, published by the Labor and Employment practice group, April 22, 2014.

Missouri Supreme Court Introduces Drastic Change to Workers’ Compensation Retaliation Law, published by the Labor and Employment practice group, April 29, 2014.

New York’s Non-Profit Revitalization Act of 2013 and Its Impact on Non-Profit Organizations, published by the Non Profit Organizations practice on April 1, 2014.

U.S. Expands Sanctions Against Russia By Freezing More Assets and Restricting Exports (IRB No. 522), published by the International Trade group, April 29, 2014.

Partnership Tax Changes:  New Salaried Member Rules from 6 April 2014published by the Tax Advice and Controversy practice group (London) on April 3, 2014.

New Consumer Regulations – Implications for Retailers doing Business in the UK, published by the London Retail team, April 17, 2014.

Sunday Trading Laws in the UK — Is The Customer Still King?, published by the London Retail team, April 17, 2014.

UK Deferred Prosecution Agreements — Key Considerations For Companies Deciding Whether To Self-Report, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team, April 2, 2014.

New Consumer Protection Law:  A Reinforced Framework for Distribution Agreements, published by the Paris Consumer Protection and Data Privacy group, April 9, 2014.

New Consumer Protection Law:  A Stricter Regime for Payment Terms, published by the Consumer Paris Protection and Data Privacy group, April 9, 2014.

EU & Competition Law Update – April 2014, published by the European Antitrust and Competition group, April 10, 2014.

 

Read More

March 2014 Client Alerts

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in March 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

The Evisceration of Attorney-Client Privilege for In-House Investigations?  District Court Rules that Internal Investigations Conducted Pursuant to Regulatory Law and Corporate Policy are Not Protected by Attorney-Client Privilege or the Work-Product Doctrine, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement, and Government Contracts Client Service Groups, March 17, 2014.

Supreme Court Holds Severance Payments Subject to FICA Taxation, published by the Tax Advice and Controversy practice group, March 26, 2014.

Will the Supreme Court Curtail Securities Fraud Lawsuits This Term? published by the Broker-Dealer Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory Practice and Investment Management groups, March 26, 2014.

Managing Legal Risks:  Trends in Mobile, Text Message, Fax and Telephone TCPA Class Action Litigation, published by the Data Privacy and Security Team, March 5, 2014.

SOX Whistleblower Protections Extend to Employees of Contractors and Subcontractors of Public Companies, published by the Labor and Employment Client Service Group, March 6, 2014.

A Significant Change is Occurring Regarding Regulatory Oversight of Banks and Their Third Party Relationships.  Both Banks and their Vendors must pay attention, published by the Financial Services Client Service Group,  Prepaid and Emerging Payments Team, March 25, 2014.

US and EU Impose Economic Sanctions in Response to the Crisis in Ukraine (IRB No. 519), published by the International Trade group  CIS Team, March 7, 2014.

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Scope of SLUSA’s Preclusion of Securities Class Actions for Violations of State Law Where Fraudulent Scheme Did Not Directly Involve Plaintiffs’ Purchase or Sale of “Covered”  Securities, published by the Class and Derivative Actions and Securities Litigation and Enforcement practice groups, March 7, 2014.

San Francisco Passes “Ban the Box” Ordinance, published by the Retail practice group, March 20, 2014.  Employers will not longer be able to ask about applicants’ criminal records.

Tax News and Developments (Winter 2013-2014), published by the Tax Advice and Controversy Client Service Group, March 21, 2014.

Reminder:  File Protective Refund Claim by April 15, 2014 for Severance Payments Made During 2010, published by the Tax Advice and Controversy Client Service Group, March 19, 2014.

Continued Expansion of U.S., EU and Canadian Sanctions on Russian Entities and Individuals in Response to Events in Crimea, published by the International Trade group and CIS Team, March 24, 2014.

US and EU Impose Economic Sanctions in Response to the Crisis in Ukraine (IRB No. 519), published by the International Trade group  CIS Team, March 7, 2014.

Whistleblowing Procedures:  The French Data Protection Authority Widens the Scope of Authorized Data Processing, published by the Data Privacy and Security team (Paris), March 3, 2014.

Retention of Title Clauses – Seller Beware!, published by the Energy and Natural Resources practice group (Asia), March 25, 2014.  The English Court of Appeal decision in Caterpillar v John Holt & Company, and its analysis of “retention of title” and “no set-off” clauses, will be of interest to commodity traders, compliance officers and legal counsel in industries dealing with energy and natural resources internationally.

UK Labor and Employment Bulletin – March 2014, published by the London Labor and Employment practice group, March 20, 2014.

EU & Competition Law Update – March 2014, published by the Antitrust and Competition group, March 14, 2014.

LCIA Rules 2014 – Final Draft Released, published by the International Arbitration group, March 12, 2014.

 

 

Read More

January 2014 – Bryan Cave Client Alerts

Client service groups throughout Bryan Cave LLP often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends.  Listed below are the client alerts published in January, 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

Qualified Plan Limits, published by Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, January 21, 2014

California “Do-Not-Track” Law Has Gone Into Effect, Requiring Some Websites to Revise Privacy Policy, published by the Data Privacy and Security Team, January 9, 2014

Federal Trade Commission Increases Interlocking Directorates Thresholds, published by Antitrust and Competition, January 24, 2014

Eleventh Circuit Holds that Affiliates of Indicted Contractor May Be Suspended from Government Contracting Indefinitely, Despite No Wrongdoing, published by Government Contracts, January 3, 2014

‘Single Asset Real Estate’:  A Concept in Need of Redefinition, published by Bankruptcy, Restructuring and Creditors’ Rights, January 15, 2014

Tax Court Upholds Captive Insurance Arrangement Despite Parent Guarantee and Captive’s Investment in Stock of Parent, published by Tax Advice and Controversy, January 16, 2014

Investment Funds Maintained by Charitable Organizations, published by the Fund Formation Team and Tax Exempt and Charitable Planning, January 7, 2014

Circuit Decision Requires Production of Foreign Bank Account Records, Thus Emphasizing Importance of IRS Amnesty Program, published by Tax Advice and Controversy and White Collar Defense and Investigations, January 9, 2014

SEC ALJ Imposes Six Month Bar on China Affiliates of Big Four Accounting Firms, published by White Collar Defense and Investigations and International Trade, January 24, 2014

Premerger Notification Thresholds Increased, published by Antitrust and Competition, January 24, 2014

EPA Adopts New ASTM Phase I Standard, published by the Environmental group, January 15, 2014

While Some Things Changed, Much Stays the Same as the EU and the United States Relax Sanctions Against Iran (IRB No. 517), published by International Trade, January 28, 2014

SCOTUS Limits the Exercise of General Personal Jurisdiction Over Multi-National Parent Corporations:  Daimler AG v. Bauman, published by Commercial Litigation, January 29, 2014

SEPA — Is There Some Respite for European and US Companies?, published by Financial Services, January 13, 2014

EU & Competition Law Update – January 2014, published by Antitrust and Competition, January 14, 2014

Overhaul of the BIS Unverified List Imposes New Requirements for Exporters (IRB No. 516), published by International Trade, January 21, 2014

UK Labor and Employment Law Bulletin – January 2014, published by Labor and Employment, January 23, 2014

Lokpal:  Finally a force to combat corruption in India, published by the India Practice Group, January 8, 2014

Read More

December 2013 – Bryan Cave Client Alerts

Client Service Groups across the Firm often prepare Alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends.  Listed below are the Alerts published in December, 2013.   Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

New SEC Guidance on Bad Actor Rules, published by the Fund Formation Team, December 20, 2013

IRS Issues New Guidance on In-Plan Roth Rollovers, published by Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, December 18, 2013

Tips and Traps for Taking Current Year Deductions for Bonus Programs Fixed by End of Year, published by Tax Advice and Controversy, December 20, 2013

Tax News and Developments – Fall 2013, published by Tax Advice and Controversy, December 20, 2013

IRS Publishes Proposed Regulations Determining Partner’s Share of Recourse Liabilities, published by Tax Advice and Controversy, December 26, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Law on Forum Selection Clauses:  Choice of Forum in Contract Should be Enforced Absent “Extraordinary Circumstances,” published by Commercial Litigation, December 23, 2013

Fifth Circuit Reverses ‘D.R. Horton’ in Another Decision Upholding Class Action Waivers, published by Class and Derivative Actions, December 17, 2013

Second Circuit Rules continuing Interest Payments are Not in Furtherance of a Conspiracy; Do Not Extend Statute of Limitations, published by White Collar Defense and Investigations and Securities Litigation, December 11, 2013

Department of Defense Imposes New Cybersecurity Requirements on its Contractors and Subcontractors, published by National Security, December 20, 2013

New Milestone:  China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Opens (IRB No. 515), published by International Trade, December 18, 2013

The Introduction of Class Actions in French Law:  Second Reading of the Bill by the French National Assembly, published by the Commercial Litigation, December 17, 2013

Foreign Companies Beware:  U.S. FCPA Enforcers Will Pursue You, published by the Global Anti-Corruption/Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Team, December 17, 2013

European Commission Announces Streamlined EU Merger Notification Process, published by Antitrust and Competition, December 11, 2013

Who You Gonna Call? — the Singapore DNC Registry Opens for Registrations, published by the Data Privacy and Security Team, December 9, 2013.

EU Competition Law Update – December 2013, published by Antitrust and Competition, December 9, 2013

PT First Media v Astro Nusantara:  A cautionary tale on the enforcement of arbitral awards and joinder of third parties, published by International Arbitration, December 2, 2013

Read More
The attorneys of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner make this site available to you only for the educational purposes of imparting general information and a general understanding of the law. This site does not offer specific legal advice. Your use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Bryan Cave LLP or any of its attorneys. Do not use this site as a substitute for specific legal advice from a licensed attorney. Much of the information on this site is based upon preliminary discussions in the absence of definitive advice or policy statements and therefore may change as soon as more definitive advice is available. Please review our full disclaimer.